Knowledge Hub
guides
Luan Fazliu

Luan Fazliu

Founder · 9 min read

guides

Co-Packing vs Full Production: Which Tea Route Fits

Co-packing or full production? This guide maps the decision to your brand stage, supplier relationships, and timeline. MOQ, cost, and control trade-offs explained.

Luan Fazliu2 August 20269 min read

Two routes exist when you decide to launch a bagged tea brand or add a tea range to an existing product lineup. The first is co-packing: you supply the tea, we bag it. The second is full production: we handle sourcing, blending, bagging, and export under one roof. Both routes use the same PT-2.33 machine, the same QC process, and the same export documentation. What differs is where your responsibility ends and ours begins.

This guide maps each route to the buyer situations where it fits. Read it before your first conversation with a co-packer - it will sharpen the questions you ask and the brief you submit.

Tea production worker overseeing industrial tea processing machinery, showing what co-packing operations look like inside a production facility

What co-packing is and who it suits

Co-packing means you bring the tea. You are responsible for:

  • The tea blend or single-herb specification
  • A supplier relationship that can deliver your tea to our facility
  • Any certifications on the blend (if you are making organic, fair trade, or medicinal claims, those certifications attach to the blend, not the bagging)
  • Artwork for the envelope and tag

We handle the rest: bagging on the PT-2.33, envelope and tag in your spec, QC through the run, batch records, pallet build to your DC requirement, and full export documentation.

Co-packing works best when:

  • You already have a tea blend you trust - from a specialist blender, a long-standing supplier, or your own cultivation and processing operation
  • You want to maintain control over recipe IP
  • Your brand has made specific sourcing claims (single-origin, from a specific farm, traceable provenance) that depend on your own supply chain
  • You are doing a short first run to validate packaging and retail response before committing to a larger program
  • You want a fast turnaround - 2-4 weeks from approved artwork to despatch

For brands that already have the tea, co-packing at a 5,000-bag floor is the most capital-efficient entry. You pay for bagging, not for recipe development or raw material sourcing.

What full production is and who it suits

Full production means we handle the supply chain from the raw herb to the finished, export-ready pallet. That includes:

  • Tea sourcing from our network of Balkan and EU-compliant suppliers
  • Recipe development or recipe execution (if you have a specification we work to it, if you have a category brief we develop from it)
  • Artwork design if needed, or artwork execution from your files
  • Printing, bagging on the PT-2.33, QC, batch records, pallet build, and export

The MOQ floor is higher for full production than for co-packing because we are locking raw material on your behalf. Tea is a commodity with supply-chain lead times. Once we book a recipe-specific ingredient - a particular Sideritis origin, a certified linden source, a specific chamomile grade - that material is committed to your SKU.

Full production works best when:

  • You are launching a new brand and do not yet have a tea supplier
  • You want a single vendor for the entire chain from raw ingredient to finished product
  • Your brand does not have strong opinions about sourcing specifics beyond category (herbal, fruit, green, etc.)
  • You want recipe IP held by a co-manufacturer rather than managing blender and co-packer relationships separately
  • Your target lead time is 8-14 weeks and you can plan ahead

Side-by-side comparison

DimensionCo-packingFull production
You supplyTea + artworkCategory brief only (or artwork if it exists)
We supplyBagging, QC, export docsTea sourcing + recipe + bagging + QC + export docs
MOQ floor5,000 bags per SKUHigher - ask for your project specifics
Lead time2-4 weeks8-14 weeks
Cost per bagLower (no sourcing markup)Higher (includes raw material and recipe work)
Recipe controlStays with youHeld by us, shared via spec sheet
Certification pathYour certifications attach to blendWe carry certifications on materials we source
Supplier riskYou carry itWe carry it
First-run riskLow - low MOQ, fast turnaroundMedium - longer commitment, higher MOQ
Best forBrand with existing tea supplyNew brand with no tea supply yet

Cost comparison

Per-bag cost is project-specific. These are the structural differences, not absolute numbers:

Co-packing cost structure: Bagging rate (machine time, materials, QC) + one-off plate setup + your tea cost (your cost, not ours) + freight.

Full production cost structure: Bagging rate + plate setup + raw material cost (our procurement, your volume determines the rate) + recipe development fee (one-off) + freight.

The raw material cost in full production is a pass-through plus a sourcing margin. The total landed cost per bag is typically higher than co-packing for the same tea category. The offset is not having to manage a blender relationship, a separate procurement operation, or the supply risk on raw materials.

For a new brand with no tea sourcing infrastructure, full production is often cheaper in total than setting up a separate blending and supply relationship, then hiring a co-packer on top.

Various dried herbs and spices in white bowls on wooden tray, showing the ingredient range used in full production recipe development

Lead time breakdown

Typical lead time2-4 weeks (co-packing)

Brief + sample

Up to 1 week

Artwork approval

1-2 weeks

Production run

2-5 days

Pallet build + despatch

1-2 days

For full production, the lead time follows a different shape. Recipe development and raw material procurement are the long poles. If you supply a precise specification with an approved ingredient list, we move into procurement immediately. If you supply a category brief and want recipe development, add 2-4 weeks for recipe prototyping and approval.

Control trade-offs

The core trade-off between routes is control vs simplicity.

Co-packing gives you more control. Your recipe is yours. Your supplier relationship is yours. If you want to switch co-packers in future, you take the blend with you. For brands with strong sourcing stories - a specific farm, a named cultivar, a region with meaning to their customers - that control is not optional. It is the brand.

Full production gives you more simplicity. One vendor. One invoice. One point of accountability from raw ingredient to export-ready pallet. For a brand launching quickly into a market where the category story (chamomile, herbal, fruit infusion) matters more than the sourcing story, the operational simplicity is worth the reduced control.

Neither is the wrong answer. The right answer depends on where your brand's value sits.

The decision question

One question cuts through most of this complexity:

Do you already have a tea you trust?

  • If yes: co-packing is likely your route. Start with a 5,000-bag sample run, validate the bag and artwork, then scale.
  • If no: full production is the cleaner path. Give us a category brief, we develop the recipe, you approve the samples, we run at your MOQ.

A secondary question: How quickly do you need to launch?

  • If 2-4 weeks: co-packing, assuming you have artwork ready or near-ready.
  • If 8-14 weeks is acceptable: either route works. Full production becomes viable.

Decision matrix

SituationRecommended routeStarting point
New brand, no supplier yetFull productionCategory brief to us
Existing brand adding a tea SKU, has blenderCo-packing5,000-bag sample run
Brand with a specific farm / origin storyCo-packingBrief us on the blend spec
Retailer own-label, wants single vendorFull productionRange brief, MOQ discussion
Fast market test, tight timelineCo-packingArtwork + tea ready to ship
Long-term private label program, EU compliance neededFull productionCompliance brief first
Hospitality brand, small specialty SKUCo-packing5,000-bag floor fits this profile

Colorful flat lay of tea packaging designs with tea bags showing the final branded output from either co-packing or full production route

Why single-format works for both routes

Both routes use the same bag: the HST PT-2.33 double-chamber, double-knot. No pyramids, no single-chamber stapled bags, no loose-leaf tins. One format, done right.

That discipline keeps our QC consistent, keeps our machine utilization predictable, and keeps per-bag economics better than they would be on a multi-format line. Whether you co-pack or go full production, the bag is the same European classic your customers already recognize from Twinings, Teekanne, and every other mainstream EU brand.

See the full bag specification on our bag page.

Getting started

If you know your route, contact us with a brief. If you are still deciding, the brief does not need to be complete - a few sentences on your brand stage, your tea (if you have it), and your target market gets the conversation started.

Both routes start with a sample. For co-packing, the sample run is 5,000 bags. For full production, we run a recipe sample before committing to production volume. Either way, you see the bag before you scale.

See co-packing service details and full production service details. For brands new to private label tea, read private label tea MOQ in Europe and private label tea cost from Kosovo.

Since 1990Family herb business36 years to DE · AT · CHNow packaging tea
Talk to us

Talk to us about your tea project

Phone, WhatsApp, or send a message. We answer Mon-Fri 09:00-18:00 CET in English, Albanian, Macedonian, and German.

Orbook a free 30-min consultation· Mon-Fri 09:00-18:00 CET

  • 1990

    Family since

  • < 4hrs

    Reply window

  • 4langs

    EN · SQ · MK · DE

  • 15countries

    Served from Kosovo